Dear men, if a girl starts to ask you these questions, she doesn't love you she's only pretending

Girls tend to think that men sometimes fall for them to an extent that, they don't think about what they are doing, but just love.

In many cases, the girls pretend to love a man, but down deep she has her motives.

Some girls can even be very stupid to be just fooling and tooling the guy around just for their fun.

A guy in love is likely to be blinded not to see anything that the girl may have been doing to him, physically, mentally, or spiritually.

But today in this article we are going to talk about things your girlfriend may be asking she doesn't love, but she is only pretending.

1. What do you for a living?

2. How much do earn per month?

3. Are your parents alive?

4. Are you still living with your parents?

5. Why do you leave your Ex?

6. Can you do anything for me?

7. What can you do for love?

8. For how long have you dated your Ex?

9. Can you buy anything I want?

10. Can you leave your parents' house when we are married?

11. What is your relationship with God?

12. What is your biggest regret in life?

13. Have ever had a thought of making suicide?

14. What are your reasons for trying to end your life?

15. Can you quit your job because of me?

16. Tell me about the worst experience in your previous relationship.

17. Do you think you have a future at this age?

18. What were your thoughts about your last summer with your Ex?

19. Can you apologize to me without you doing anything?

20. Can you break up with me, even if I slapped you for no reason?

List of questions your girlfriend will ask you she loves you.

You don't have to believe me, in the above-mentioned statements, but it is the reality, any girl that loves you, will hardly ever ask you the questions that are questioning your integrity no matter what.

Guys, If You Want To Know If A Girl Loves You From The Bottom Of Her Heart, Give Her These 5 Tests.

 As a man, there are some ways to know if a girl loves you from the bottom of her heart and I am here today to show you how to do that, because before you propose to any girl, or be with any girl, you should know if she loves you from the bottom of her heart for your own good.

Human beings are blessed with the ability of deception, and someone who does not love you might even pretend that she does for more than a year just because of the things she gains from you, but worry no more, I will tell you how to know if she truly love you in this article, just try and read to the end.

Before I list those ways, you should stop trying to get a lady by throwing money at her, no one will reject good things and real men don't play such games.

1.

When you are with her, try to talk about eating out or clubbing and just spending money like it grows on trees and see how she will react, because a girl who loves you for the bottom of her heart will not allow you do that.

Instead, she will take little money, cook whatever you want at home and tell you to save the rest, but a girl who doesn't jump up and want you two to just spend the money, she will not care about your future, or whether you even have enough or not.

2.

Set up a separate account, put 20 thousand Naira in the account, give her the ATM card and tell her to go and withdraw any amount of money she wants from the account and buy whatever she wants for herself, and then see how much she will take.

A girl who truly loves you will check the balance and take only 25 percent of the money which is 5,000 Naira, but a girl who doesn't will.most likely rake everything.

3.

When you are with her, try and open up the discussion with regards her plan for the future for you and her and see what she will say, of how she will react.

A girl who loves you from the bottom of her heart will be very happy to discuss it with you, she will even want to start life with you immediately, but if she does not, she will be postponing it until you stop bringing up the topic.

4.

Try and bring up the idea of going to see her parents or tell her to introduce you to her parents, family and relatives and see how she will respond to that.

If she does not love you, she will either say it is too early even if you have been with her for a year, or she will find a way to avoid it until you stop asking.

5.

A girl who truly love you will never want to win in an argument with you. Try and raise an argument, if she loves you from the bottom of her heart, she will be quick to say i am sorry, but later, she will then tell you about your wrong. Mind you, you then have to apologize to her and tell her it was just a test.

Women who truly loves you will just want you to be happy even at their own expense.

Well, now you know what to do in order to find out if a girl love you from the bottom of her heart. Do these and thank me later.

Please, like and share this post, let others know, don't forget to leave a comment about what you think with regards to this post in the comments section and follow my account for more relationships posts, thank you.

relationship with President Buhari, IBB’s families

One of the sons of Nigeria’s late Head of State, Sani Abacha, Sadiq, has disclosed how the family relates with President Muhammadu Buhari.

Sadiq said his family relates fine with President Buhari’s family.

Speaking with BBC Hausa service on Wednesday, the son of the late dictator said his family also relates well with that of ex-Head of State, Ibrahim Babangida, IBB.

He also lamented that most of his father’s friends abandoned them after his demise.

According to Sadique: “We relate well with the Babangida family.

“Our present relationship with some of our late father’s friends is surprising. We exchange pleasantries with the family of General Babangida. We are in good terms.

READ ALSO : Gov Oyetola’s Deputy Chief of Staff, Adebisi is dead: Police officer regains freedom

“It is only with members of the Babangida family that whenever we meet, we associate and share stories.

“We also relate well with family members of President Muhammadu Buhari. But it’s only with the Babangida’s family that we recall the past.”

England test and trace system identifies 31,000 contacts

More than 31,000 close contacts were identified during the first week of the test and trace system in England, figures show.

Of those, 85% were reached in 24 hours and asked to self-isolate for 14 days.

This was from 8,000 people testing positive for coronavirus - two-thirds of whom provided details of their close contacts.

Around 25,000 contact tracers were recruited in England and started work at the end of May.

The NHS figures, which cover 28 May to 3 June, are the first to be released showing the progress of the contact tracing scheme.

'More to do'

Baroness Dido Harding, who runs NHS Test and Trace in England, said there was still "more to do to improve the speed" of the system but she said "the vast majority of people are participating and playing their part".

"I want to say thank you to people for protecting themselves and their communities," she added.

The system has been unable to reach 15% of close contacts, either because they were unavailable, their contact details were wrong or they did not respond to texts, emails or calls from contact tracers.

They are told to try calling 10 times in a 24-hour period.

Some who were reached did not agree to self-isolate.

But Baroness Harding said there had been "good numbers of compliance".

As lockdown eases, and people start to return to work and go out to shops, it's expected the number of contacts people have will start to grow from a low starting point.

Does this represent a good start?

The data from the test and trace system in England has been eagerly anticipated - after all, this system will be crucial in helping contain local outbreaks, enabling the country to ease out of lockdown.

It is still early days, but how should we interpret these findings?

Firstly, the system seems to be pretty good at reaching the contacts of people who have tested positive, if those positive cases engage with the contact tracers and provide details in the first place.

The problem is a third of people who test positive are not providing details.

This could be because the contact tracers are not as good as they should be at tracking those who do not engage with the online forms (the first point of call for the system).

There have been suggestions that sufficient translation support is not always available, for example.

But incorrect contact details being provided and people simply refusing to take calls - despite repeated attempts - are certainly factors too.

The key to the success of the system will be both an efficient service and public engagement in taking calls and following the advice to self-isolate.

What is test and trace?

It's a way of controlling the spread of the virus by asking people who have tested positive for coronavirus to share information on who they have been in close contact with.

It starts with getting a test if you have symptoms.

If you test positive for the virus, tracers will text, email or call you and ask you to log on to the NHS Test and Trace website to provide details of contacts.

Close contacts will then be told to stay at home for 14 days, even if they don't have symptoms.

This process is organised slightly differently around the UK.

What happens around the UK?

In Scotland, the system is called NHS Test and Protect, Between 28 May and 7 June 2020, 741 contacts were traced from 681 positive tests for the virus - an average of 1.5 contacts per case.

Northern Ireland was the first part of the UK to bring in contact tracing.

Contact tracing started in Wales on 1 June and is called 'test, trace, protect'.

Coronavirus: Ministers consider NHS contact-tracing app rethink

Concerns about the risks of deploying a go-it-alone UK coronavirus contact-tracing app are causing further delays.

A second version of the smartphone software was due to have begun testing on the Isle of Wight on Tuesday, but the government decided to postpone the trial.

Ministers are considering switching the app over to tech developed by Apple and Google.

But countries testing that model are experiencing issues of their own.

Health Secretary Matt Hancock had originally said the NHS Covid-19 app was to be launched across England - and possibly other parts of the UK - by 1 June.

But he subsequently said the government had decided it would be better to establish a network of human contract tracers first.

However, the BBC has discovered that one of the main reasons the initiative is running behind schedule is that developers are having problems using Bluetooth as a means to estimate distance.

Even so, they still believe they are better placed to tackle the challenge than counterparts overseas who are working under constraints imposed by the two US tech firms.

Bluetooth handshakes

Contact-tracing apps are designed to prevent a second wave of infections by keeping a log of when two people are in close proximity to each other and for how long.

If one of the users later tests positive for the disease, the records are used to determine how likely it is they infected the other. If required, an alert is triggered to help prevent the further spread of the virus.

The UK has adopted what is known as a "centralised" approach, meaning that the contact-matching process is carried out on a remote computer server. One benefit is it offers epidemiologists more data to tackle the pandemic. France and India are other countries to have adopted this model.

By contrast, Apple and Google's "decentralised" approach carries out the matches on the handsets themselves, on the grounds this better protects users' privacy.

Poland switched its app from a centralised to decentralised approach on Tuesday. Switzerland, Ireland, Germany, Italy and Latvia are among others to have adopted the tech giants' design.

Both systems rely on Bluetooth "handshakes" to work.

Number 10 is concerned that iPhones will not always detect each other because of a restriction Apple has imposed on apps that do not adopt its model.

But the UK team has devised a workaround and is more concerned about other limitations of using Bluetooth.

Train trouble

Some of these issues were outlined in a study published by Trinity College Dublin last month.

It highlighted problems with using received Bluetooth signal strength as a means to estimate distance.

Researchers warned signal strength "can vary substantially" depending on:

• how deeply a handset is placed in a bag
• whether the signal has to pass through a human body to reach the other phone
• if the two people are walking side-by-side or one behind the other
• if the devices are indoors rather than outdoors
• whether the smartphone is surrounded by metal objects

The report highlighted troubling results when Singapore's TraceTogether app was tested.

An experiment within a stationary train carriage found that when users moved from a distance of 3.5m (11.5ft) to 4m, signals became stronger rather than weaker because of the way metal objects were reflecting the radio waves.

A trial in a supermarket also found the received signal strength was the same whether two people were walking close together or 2m apart.

Follow-up tests using Apple-Google's tech are currently under way.

"The work is ongoing, but preliminary results are broadly consistent with previous observations," said Dr Brendan Jennings, who has been tasked with assessing the effectiveness of Ireland's Covid-19 app.

Hidden data

The team behind Switzerland's SwissCovid app is carrying out tests of its own.

Its Bluetooth measurement chief believes the issue can be partly addressed by taking a range of readings over a period of five minutes or more.

But he added that Apple and Google had placed curbs on what could be achieved.

"The Google and Apple API [application programming interface] limits the amount of raw information that is actually exposed to the app," Prof Mathias Payer told the BBC.

"For maximum utility, we would get all the different measurements, but this has privacy implications."

Apps using Google and Apple's tech do not get to see the actual signal strength but rather one of three values, based on calculations used to normalise the different ways Bluetooth behaves on different handsets,

By contrast, the UK team can currently obtain the measurements directly.

Those responsible believe a further advantage of their centralised approach is that the data can be processed on the server involved, since it would be too taxing a task to be done on smartphones.

But part of their challenge is communicating this to Baroness Dido Harding - who heads up the wider Test and Trace programme - and 10 Downing Street itself.

A spokesman for the prime minister declined to comment.

Coronavirus: Could social distancing of less than two metres work?

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has promised to keep the 2m (6ft) rule for social distancing "under constant review".

It comes after increasing pressure from MPs and the hospitality industry to cut it to 1m to help businesses after they reopen.

However, scientists continue to question whether that would be safe, given how little is known about how far coronavirus can spread.

What does the science say?

The simple answer is that the nearer you are to someone who is infected, the greater the risk of catching the virus.

The World Health Organization says that a distance of 1m is safe. Some countries have adopted this guidance, while others, including the UK, have gone further:

• 1m distancing rule - China, Denmark, France, Hong Kong, Lithuania, Singapore
• 1.4m - South Korea
• 1.5m - Australia, Belgium, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal
• 1.8m - US
• 2m - Canada, Spain, UK

It's not just about distance

Timing is also key. The longer you spend in close proximity with an infected person, the bigger the risk.

Scientists advising the UK government say that spending six seconds at a distance of 1m from someone is the same as spending one minute at a distance of 2m.

Being exposed to someone coughing is riskier. Being 2m away from a cough carries the same risk as someone talking to you for 30 minutes at the same distance.

What's the latest research?

In a study published in the medical journal The Lancet, scientists evaluated recent research into how coronavirus spreads.

They conclude that keeping at least 1m from other people could be the best way to limit the chances of infection.

The risk of being infected is estimated to be 13% within 1m, but only 3% beyond that distance.

And the study says that for every extra metre of distance up to 3m, the risk is further reduced by half.

Where does the distancing rule come from?

It can be traced back to research in the 1930s.

Scientists found that droplets of liquid released by coughs or sneezes evaporate quickly in the air or fall to the ground.

Most of those droplets, they reckoned, would land within 1-2m.

That is why it is said the greatest risks come from having the virus coughed at you from close range, or from touching a surface that someone coughed onto, and then touching your face.

Can the virus travel further in other ways?

Proximity and surface contact are considered the main transmission routes.

But some researchers fear coronavirus can also be transported through the air in tiny particles called aerosols.

If true, then the flow of wind from someone's breath could carry the virus over longer distances.

Prof Lydia Bourouiba from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) used high-speed cameras to capture a cough projecting miniature specks as far as 6m.

And a study carried out in Chinese hospitals which found traces of coronavirus in Covid-19 wards and intensive care units, estimated that 4m was a better safe distance.

But the US Centers for Disease Control says the role of aerosols in spreading the virus is "currently uncertain".

And what's still not known is whether any virus that spreads further than 2m can still be infectious.

• Coronavirus: Can we stay safe as lockdown eases?

What else makes a difference?

It is widely accepted that the infection is more easily passed on indoors than outside in the fresh air.

Japanese researchers investigated 110 cases of Covid-19, following up the contacts of those infected.

They estimated that the odds of the infection being passed on were nearly 19 times greater indoors than outside.

In many countries, including England and Scotland, people are being encouraged to wear face coverings on public transport and "enclosed spaces where social distancing is not always possible".

Why don't we have definite answers?

It is only a few months since the coronavirus emerged, and in that short time scientists have learned a great deal about it.

But there is a long way to go, and confirming exactly the right distance is one of the unanswered questions.

Answering it will require careful studies of how the virus can be carried, and how viable it remains, which will all take time.

Proptech and the Rising Tide of Technology in the Real Estate Industry

It is no secret that utilizing newer technology like big data and analytics can shake up and revolutionize nearly any industry. The real estate industry is no exception here, and has, in fact, already begun reaping the rewards that big data and data-driven technologies can provide.

The huge amounts of data generated by the real estate industry can be leveraged to its advantage even further going forward as new technology and ideas are pushing the envelope for the real estate industry at both the macro and micro scale.

One of the most basic and powerful data-driven tools that the real estate industry has at their disposal comes in the form of analytics. The benefits of data analytics in real estate extend to both the consumers and realtors because it allows for advanced property evaluation across a huge spectrum of parameters from expected appreciation and depreciation rates to crime statistics, accessibility, and other factors. This not only allows for real estate companies to determine value more accurately and mitigate risk, but increases customer engagement as well, providing them with highly relevant information regarding potential purchases.

The huge amount of real estate data available can, and should, be leveraged for maximum predictive impact just as Wall Street uses the data available to model algorithmic trading. Through the use of data analytics, realtors and investors are able to keep up to date on vital market data in real-time, allowing for the ability to stay ahead of the curve on the rapidly changing market of commercial real estate. Accurate, timely market data can make a massive impact on a company’s ability to turn a profit on a piece of real estate and empowers potential home buyers by providing a comprehensive view of the market even as it changes minute to minute.

While these huge pools of real estate data are already being used by Artificial Intelligence programs to improve the customer experience through personalization and predictive home evaluation over time, AI can further change the real estate game. AI can help to accurately predict which locations will be the most beneficial for developers to invest in, optimizing market-level profitability and revenue and revenue as well as helping to identify optimized spatial layouts of new developments.

Virtual Reality

Though the real estate industry has been relatively slow in hopping on the big data train, it has taken a short amount of time for the industry to see the massive value that data brings to the table. Data can show investors, developers, and potential buyers detailed and pertinent information about real estate without ever having to see it in person. While macro-level data like land valuation, crime statistics, accessibility, and traffic flow are incredibly important when looking at real estate development and investing, the data generated at the micro-level is now coming into play in a big way.

Data comes in a variety of different forms, and while it can be easy to be tempted to shelf classic visual data for the more esoteric sets of data pertaining to a piece of real estate. Visual data, however, is actually at the forefront of one of the more inventive and exciting data-driven technologies being used in the real estate industry today. When enough visual data is available, realtors can implement Virtual Reality technology in order to give prospective buyers a tour of the property, giving an in-depth look at the dimensions of any given building that a static photograph simply cannot provide.

Again, VR is another new data-fueled technology that benefits both buyers and sellers of real estate. Realtors massively expand their market as they don’t have to set up actual appointments to show a home and can actually show it simultaneously to many different potential clients. Additionally, homes can be staged virtually through VR, turning an empty and visually cold, unfurnished home into a staged home in an instant with the ability to change any furniture or fixtures in the blink of an eye to appeal to any number of aesthetic palettes.

Informed Decisions

The real estate industry has been long considered generally conservative, relying on more Luddite business methods and general entrepreneurial skills to operate quite successfully for decades. This is all changing with the rise of “Proptech”, technologies that capitalize on the huge amounts of data generated in the world of real estate, which is working to help both purveyors and purchasers to make more informed decisions.

Quantifiable data, whether gathered from historical sources, social media platforms, or any other number of sources, work to show a bigger picture than many are used to seeing. When investors, realtors, and buyers are all able to see the forest for the trees, everyone comes out ahead as they have the ability to make a better decision based on all of the available data instead of just historical data or gut feelings.

In its raw form, much of the data generated by or relating to the real estate industry isn’t all that helpful. However, with the power of data analytics, machine learning tools, and Artificial Intelligence, the heavy-duty number crunching is taken care of, leaving a distilled and very useable product. In a way, these new technologies are really leveling the playing field when it comes to real estate, providing the same advantage to anyone willing to take the time to apply big data in an effective way.

These technologies are unlikely to outright upend the real estate industry anytime soon, considering the industry’s historically slow adoption of new technology. They will, however, revolutionize how properties are sold, evaluated, marketed, and even seen on a very real level.